Subject Line:
How Bloggers Can Get Better Guest Posts
Date Received:
Tue Oct 10 2017 19:00:06 GMT+0000 (UTC)
Lead Generation Insights Blog (
Desktop View
Mobile View
Web Version        Like   Tweet      Forward

How Bloggers Can Get Better Guest Posts []

Posted by Brad Shorr

A lot has been written about how to pitch a guest blog post, and rightfully so. Many widely used pitch techniques are awful.

Nevertheless, on the publisherbs side of the fence, improvements can be made as well b improvements that would help bloggers get far more relevant and useful guest submissions. I write a lot of guest posts, and have been fortunate to work with terrific publishers such as  Carol Roth [],  All [],  Smashing Magazine [],  Crazy Egg [],  Salesforce [], and many more. Here are a few things that these top publishers do well, and make it easy for me, as a guest writer, to do the job right.

Top publishers explain who their audience is and why they read the blog. Some publishers expect potential guest authors to figure this out for themselves, I suppose as a way to demonstrate motivation. However, itbs not always easy to figure it out. If the authorbs guess is even a little off, the topic and angle of the proposed article will also be a little off, leading to more editing down the road b or an outright rejection. Seems to me a waste of time, especially since the publisher can convey this information with perfect accuracy in a couple of sentences. In short, good publishers make it easy for writers to be on point. Top publishers have high, documented standards. I love getting my hands on a publisherbs editorial guidelines, ideally before a pitch. Itbs extremely helpful to understand issues such as word count, voice, image requirements and linking policies in advance of doing creative work. Editorial guidelines are also a great filter for the publisher. Writers may find that certain style, word count or other requirements make the publisher a bad fit. Knowing the ground rules before the game starts saves everyone a lot of wasted motion.

Top publishers want writing, not SEO. Although SEO drives a lot of guest pitches, I donbt think itbs a good practice for publishers to have guest authors do the  SEO work  []for them. For instance, some publishers want (or demand) guest submissions to include several links to their on-site content b itbs hard enough to research and write a post without having to worry about the publisherbs internal link structure. In addition, Ibm not sure how well this policy supports the publisherbs SEO anyway, since it inevitably leads to a random, overblown collection of internal links,  which is not what Google wants []. Another common issue is when publishers insist on inclusion of certain keywords that may make sense for their SEO campaigns but arenbt particularly relevant to the guest post. And, incidentally, a lot of the keyword requirements that I see are badly outdated anyway, and will do the publisher more harm than good. Top publishers treat guest writers like team members. Every great publisher Ibve worked with has diligent, professional, enthusiastic and skilled people who help me improve my submission. These people not only make appropriate edits, they explain why the edits are necessary. Explanations accelerate the writerbs learning curve, so the second, third and fourth submissions will (letbs hope) require fewer edits and be stronger overall. When writers feel this kind of love, it inspires confidence and creativity. When writers donbt feel it, quality suffers. Loving writers is good for business!

Yes, pitch techniques need to be continuously improved, but I hope publishers are continuously improving their pitch reception techniques, as well. Teamwork and high standards is the winning combination all the way around.

You're receiving this because you subscribed from our website.  Unsubscribe

1001 West 31st Street

Suite 100

Downers Grove, IL 60515